Skip to main content

Module 4: Cross-Functional Teams, Leadership, & Autonomy

Revisiting Foundations for Sensemaking

Reflecting on Module 4 Readings

Personal Takeaways & Key Insights: 

  • The makeup of the team is paramount.  Cross-functional teams foster greater alignment and support sensemaking. 
  • Providing autonomy empowers teams to perform at the highest levels.  
  • Leadership support should provide a sound structure on which teams can stand.
  • Create an enabling structure
  • Ensure organizational systems are in place
  • Leave space for well-timed coaching interventions

Summary of Reflection: 

In this module, the readings provided examples of cross-functional teams and the benefits of this approach. In particular, the readings evaluated the performance of the Butler Manufacturing Company. The work of this organization required multiple disciplines and expertise; however, the team ensured all participants received cross-training so that bottlenecks could be avoided if a team member had to step away. This approach supported the team's achievement of the aligned goals and supported individual growth among team members.  


We also began to explore considerations for leaders when in positions to oversee teams across organizations. The readings touched on the importance of autonomy and how trusting and empowering teams to make decisions while providing appropriate direction and guardrails as needed impacts performance. Reflecting on my personal experiences, I feel many organizations struggle with this. Organizations often have micro managerial cultures that do not provide space for teams to flourish. Furthermore, teams in these environments often appear handicapped, frustrated, and ultimately stuck. This limits the team's ability to achieve success and certainly hinders the ability to perform to its potential. 


So how can leaders support teams? The readings highlighted three critical points (also mentioned in the journal archive below).


  1. Provide an enabling structure
  2. Ensure organizational support systems are in place
  3. Leave space for coaching interventions when the time is right

Journal Entry Archive: 

Elaboration

 I spent some time reflecting back on the Butler Manufacturing Company structure and how the team members moved through the different phases of the work. Their work required assembly, fabrication, painting, machining, and shipping. The team could have chosen to “stay in their lanes”; however, imagine the bottlenecks that would ensue if this was their approach. This passage of the text reinforced, indirectly, the importance of cross-functional teams. Not just for the sake of the team meeting its goals and objectives but for the betterment of each individual team member. This approach allowed team members to expand their skill sets and overall understanding of the entire project. In addition, this cross-functional approach fostered an even more significant alignment of the team around the shared goals and objectives and positioned team members to support one another. 


Concrete Examples

This quote says it all, “Employee autonomy does not just empower your people to do their best work, it taps into a deeper, more personal motivation that surpasses what external rewards, like money, can offer. This leads to passionate employees that are more creative, confident, and productive, which in turn leads to more successful businesses with a better bottom line” (Bigham, 2022). Our readings in this module touched on the importance of autonomy concerning teams; however, as I was reading, I reflected on the struggle I have seen with many organizations concerning this concept leading to punitive and micro managerial environments that suffocate employee passion. This culture and lack of autonomy certainly do not foster the team environment organizations should strive to achieve. Furthermore, as quoted above, providing autonomy leads to great personal satisfaction in one’s job and intrinsic motivation. 


Bigham, B. (2022, October 27). Why leaders should encourage employee autonomy. 15Five. Retrieved November 20, 2022, from https://www.15five.com/blog/employee-autonomy/ 


Dual Coding 

Directly from the readings, a section summarized how leaders could support their teams, highlighting three key points. 


The three critical points made included: 

  1. Provide an enabling structure for the team
    1. Depicted as the bridge
  2. Ensure organizational systems are in place to support the team 
    1. Depicted as the support systems providing the enabler 
  3. Well-timed coaching interventions
    1. When navigating the gaps or taking the initial steps, I imagine the leaders holding the enabling structure, coaching, and guiding the team to reach the other side of their goals/objectives. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Module1: Team Forming ......Naturally!

The Foundations of High-Performing Teams  A Reflection on Module 1 Readings Personal Takeaways & Key Insights:  Clarity and alignment of goals Establishing an organizational culture that fosters natural team-forming Mutual Accountability Trust Summarizing my key takeaways from this module, I touch on the importance of goal setting, mutual accountability, supportive leadership, and most importantly TRUST amongst team members.   Elaboration This week's readings set the stage for understanding the foundations of high-performing teams. The example of the naturally developed team was interesting to me and reinforced the need for clarity and alignment around performance goals and mutual accountability. How do teams form naturally? When team members have their eyes set on achieving a common goal, they have an individual incentive to work with team members of varying skill sets to achieve that goal. The goals become more significant than their individual needs for succes...

Getting Started: Anchor's Away!

Module 1  Reflecting on Personal Experience: During the first week of this course, we were asked to document our initial understanding of high-performance teams by reflecting on past experiences.  As I am sure everyone can relate, not all team experiences are positive.  It is much easier to recall bad examples (particularly during our MBA pursuit) than it is to recall positive experiences; however, this exercise forced us to dig deeper to differentiate the two experiences by reflecting on influencers of high-performing teams.   For example, reflecting on my past experiences, I provided three characteristics of high-performing and low-performing teams.  High Performing Teams:  Alignment and adoption of shared goals and objectives Clearly defined roles and responsibilities Trust and Accountability Low Performing Teams: Siloed work-streams  Poor Communication Lack of clarity around the team’s purpose Following this exercise to reflect on strong and w...

Summarizing My Experience In this Course

 Understanding Effective Teams A Personal Reflection of this Journey:  Thank you for a fun and informative semester.  I would like to personally thank our TA as well for always providing thoughtful and insightful feedback to each and every item submitted.  Not only was the feedback helpful, but it was also always delivered in a positive and motivating tone.  Reflecting back on the journey this semester I revisited questions I entered into the course hoping to better understand.  My Key Questions:  As a leader, how do I foster an organizational culture that breads natural teaming? How does a leader influence a team when one or more members does not seem to be committed to the team's goas and objectives? How does the leader keep the team on track?  Personal Growth Opportunities:  To identify opportunities to grow as a leader in understanding how to influence my organization to naturally develop teams.  Knowing when to step away and let the...